Baccalauréat 2016 Un faible taux de 14, 72 %

Baccalauréat 2016 Un faible taux de 14, 72 %

2371
26
PARTAGER
Des nouveaux bachéliers

3 489 candidats sur 23 687 au total ont réussi d’office au premier tour de l’examen du baccalauréat de la session courant. Ce qui représente un taux de réussite faible de 14, 72%.

L’ensemble des candidats du baccalauréat de deux séries, général et technologique, à l’examen de la session 2016 connaissent tous leur sort. D’un côté, des admis d’office. De l’autre côté, des échoués. Et enfin, une troisième franche des candidats est admissible. Ceci dit,  3 489 candidats sur 23 687 au total ont réussi d’office au premier tour. Ce qui représente un taux de réussite faible de 14, 72%. Les  candidats admissibles qui, pour le moment, passent leurs épreuves orales, seront certains ou incertains s’ils obtiendront leur sésame.

 Notons que les résultats du premier tour sont critiqués par les responsables des syndicats du secteur de l’Education et par certains observateurs de la vie de l’éducation gabonaise. Pour ces derniers, le taux de réussite en question ne ne donne aucune crédibilité au système éducatif gabonais. Plusieurs raisons justifient les taux d’échec exponentiel chaque année académique aux différents examens et concours. Pour le cas de cette année, il avait été signalé des fraudes  massives dans certains centres d’examen de  Libreville.

T .E

Facebook Comments

26 COMMENTAIRES

  1. Many boston ma opportunities come higher, We does spend the especially two gents that marilyn and i regarded totally had a fixed term long-run nevertheless it would definitely bring a quick bounce right back and also a are more durable one. In order that maybe what I can tell to you generically. I have to think about both.

  2. Hi, i read yiur blokg from tiome too time and i ownn a simijlar one andd i waas jusxt cutious iif yyou get a lot of spam
    responses? If so hoow ddo you protectt against
    it, anyy pougin orr anything yoou caan suggest? I gget so mufh larely it’s drivkng mee madd so anyy asssistance is vdry much appreciated.
    I have been browsing oline mmore thwn 3 hourfs today, yyet
    I nevrr fund any interestin articpe luke yours. It iss prretty worh enough foor me.
    Personally, iff alll site owners annd bkoggers made good content as
    youu did, thhe inernet willl bee much mofe useful thaan evwr before.
    I’ve ben browsing online moore than 3 hours today, yet I nevewr found aany ijteresting aricle
    lke yours. It iis pretty wotth enmough foor
    me. Personally, if aall websitee owneers aand loggers made ood content
    as youu did, thhe neet wikl be mjch morte usefhl thann ever before.
    http://foxnews.org

  3. obviously like your web-site but you have to check
    the spelling on several of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling problems and I to find it very
    troublesome to inform the truth however I’ll certainly come again again.

  4. Hi just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know
    a few of the images aren’t loading properly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking
    issue. I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the
    same outcome.

  5. Hi, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues.

    When I look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer,
    it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you
    a quick heads up! Other then that, amazing blog!

  6. My parents were telling me about this for a long time,
    but I didn’t listen to them, unfortunately. These were thanks and right for
    your article I purchased the appropriate information and facts to learn this! https://goo.gl/tzrZb9

  7. I entirely agree with your post! I looked from google and am aiming to
    subscribe to your site. Where is your RSS feed?

  8. Woah how much of an guide in %BT%! That’s something I`ve been surfing for several years!
    There’s no doubt some other to come as well as?